Hello Peers, Today we will share all week’s assessment and quiz answers of the Think Again I: How to Understand Arguments course launched by Coursera, free of costβ β β . This is a certification course for every interested student.
In case you didn’t find this course for free, then you can apply for financial ads to get this course for totally free.
Check out this article – “How to Apply for Financial Ads?”
- About The Coursera
- About Think Again I: How to Understand Arguments Course
- Think Again I: How to Understand Arguments Quiz Answers
- Week 1: Think Again I: How to Understand Arguments Coursera Quiz Answers
- Quiz 1: Why Arguments Matter
- Quiz 2: What Is an Argument?
- Quiz 3: What are Arguments Used For? Justification
- Quiz 4: Strong Arguments Donβt Always Persuade Everyone
- Quiz 5: What Else are Arguments Used For? Explanation
- Quiz 6: What are Arguments Made Of? Language
- Quiz 7: Meaning
- Quiz 7: Linguistic Acts
- Quiz 8: Speech Acts
- Quiz 9: Conversational Acts
- Week 2: Think Again I: How to Understand Arguments Coursera Quiz Answers
- Week 3: Think Again I: How to Understand Arguments Coursera Quiz Answers
- Week 4: Think Again I: How to Understand Arguments Coursera Quiz Answers
- Week 1: Think Again I: How to Understand Arguments Coursera Quiz Answers
- More About This Course
- Conclusion
About The Coursera
Coursera, India’s biggest learning platform launched millions of free courses for students daily. These courses are from various recognized universities, where industry experts and professors teach very well and in a more understandable way.
Here, you will find Think Again I: How to Understand Arguments Exam Answers in Bold Color below.
These answers are updated recently and are 100% correctβ answers of all week, assessment, and final exam answers of Think Again I: How to Understand Arguments from Coursera Free Certification Course.
Use βCtrl+Fβ To Find Any Questions Answer. & For Mobile User, You Just Need To Click On Three dots In Your Browser & You Will Get A βFindβ Option There. Use These Option to Get Any Random Questions Answer.
About Think Again I: How to Understand Arguments Course
In this course, you will learn what an argument is. The definition of argument will enable you to identify when speakers are giving arguments and when they are not.
Course Apply Link – Think Again I: How to Understand Arguments
Think Again I: How to Understand Arguments Quiz Answers
Week 1: Think Again I: How to Understand Arguments Coursera Quiz Answers
Quiz 1: Why Arguments Matter
Q1. All Letters to the Editor give arguments.
- True
- False
Q2. Arguments are explicit ways to formulate reasons.
- True
- False
Q3. This course will be fun.
- True
- False
Quiz 2: What Is an Argument?
Q1. Arguments are verbal fights.
- True
- False
Q2. Every argument includes a conclusion.
- True
- False
Q3. All arguments are made up of (or expressed in) language
- True
- False
Q4. Every argument is intended to establish a conclusion that the audience did not believe before.
- True
- False
Q5. Every argument succeeds in giving good reasons for its conclusion.
- True
- False
Q6. Megafauna: n. very large animals.
- Yes, this is an argument.
- No, this is not an argument.
Q7. Reptiles include turtles, alligators, crocodiles, snakes, lizards, and the tuatara.
- Yes, this is an argument.
- No, this is not an argument
Q8. World War II occurred after World War I occurred.
- Yes, this is an argument.
- No, this is not an argument.
Q9. World War II occurred because World War I occurred.
- Yes, this is an argument.
- No, this is not an argument.
Q10. The sides of this right triangle are 1 meter long, so its hypotenuse is 2 meters long.
- Yes, this is an argument.
- No, this is not an argument.
Quiz 3: What are Arguments Used For? Justification
Q1. We need to understand the purpose of an artifact in order to understand that artifact.
- True
- False
Q2. Whether you succeed in persuading someone depends on what effect your argument has on that person.
- True
- False
Q3. Whether you succeed in justifying a conclusion depends on what effect your argument has on the audience.
- True
- False
Q4. Whenever you are trying to justify a conclusion, you are trying to persuade someone.
- True
- False
Quiz 4: Strong Arguments Donβt Always Persuade Everyone
Q1. If your argument does not persuade your audience, it is no good.
- True
- False
Q2. An argument that does not give any good reason to believe its conclusion can still persuade someone to believe its conclusion.
- True
- False
Q3. Sometimes people cannot be persuaded by very strong arguments because they refuse to give up their beliefs.
- True
- False
Q4. When people use arguments, they always intend to have some effect on other people.
- True
- False
Q5. Can any argument persuade every person in the world?
- Yes
- No
Quiz 5: What Else are Arguments Used For? Explanation
Q1. The goal of explanation is understanding.
- True
- False
Q2. All explanations are given in the form of arguments.
- True
- False
Q3. Whenever you predict that something will happen, you explain why it happens.
- True
- False
Q4. The population of India explains why it won more medals than the United States in the 2012 Olympics.
- True
- False
Q5. Why did he add more sugar? To make the cake sweeter.
- causal
- teleological
- material
- formal
Q6. Why is the pillow so soft? Because it is filled with duck feathers.
- causal
- teleological
- material
- formal
Q7. Why doesnβt the screwdriver work with the slotted screw? Because it is a Phillips screwdriver (with a cross-shaped end).
- causal
- teleological
- material
- formal
Q8. Why did the tire on her car go flat? Because it was punctured by a nail.
- causal
- teleological
- material
- formal
Quiz 6: What are Arguments Made Of? Language
Q1. The English language could use the word βdeathβ to refer to life.
- True
- False
Q2. I can make the word βbaboonβ in the public English language mean my sisterβs friends simply by stipulating that I personally will use the word βbaboonβ to refer to my sisterβs friends.
- True
- False
Q3. People are always aware of the rules that they follow when they speak.
- True
- False
Q4. People are never aware of the rules that they follow when they speak.
- True
- False
Quiz 7: Meaning
Q1. Arguments are fallacious when they are spoken in heavy accents.
- True
- False
Q2. The meaning of the phrase βmy carβ is the same as the object that is my car.
- True
- False
Q3. We can describe the meaning of a word or sentence by specifying how it is used.
- True
- False
Q4. To say βI am sorryβ is to apologize to someone even if that person does not forgive you, so apologizing is
- a linguistic act
- a speech act
- a conversational act
Q5. To utter a series of words that are meaningful together is to perform
- a linguistic act
- a speech act
- a conversational act
Q6. To alert someone to a danger is to make that person aware of that danger, so alerting is
- a linguistic act
- a speech act
- a conversational act
Quiz 7: Linguistic Acts
Q1. The old man the ship.
- Yes, it is meaningful.
- No, it is not meaningful.
Q2. I feel as much like I did yesterday as I do today.
- Yes, it is meaningful.
- No, it is not meaningful.
Q3. The cotton clothing is made of grows in Mississippi.
- Yes, it is meaningful.
- No, it is not meaningful.
Q4. The square root of pine is tree.
- Yes, it is meaningful.
- No, it is not meaningful.
Quiz 8: Speech Acts
Q1. A verb fails the thereby test if there is any case in any circumstance where I say βIβ but I do not thereby
- True
- False
Q2. Whenever a verb passes the thereby test (that is, whenever the verb fits into the blank in βIf I say βI β in appropriate circumstances, then I thereby β), the verb names a speech act.
- True
- False
Q3. Concluding is a speech act.
- True
- False
Q4. When I say, βI order you to leaveβ in appropriate circumstances, then I thereby order you to leave.
- True
- False
Q5. When I say, βI ordered you to leave yesterdayβ in appropriate circumstances, then I thereby ordered you to leave yesterday.
- True
- False
Q6. When I say, βMy sister orders you to leaveβ in appropriate circumstances, then I thereby order you to leave.
- True
- False
Q7. When I say, βI apologize for hurting youβ in appropriate circumstances, then I thereby apologize for hurting you.
- True
- False
Q8. When I say, βI am sorry for hurting youβ in appropriate circumstances, then I thereby am sorry for hurting you.
- True
- False
Q9. When I say, βI advise you to keep tryingβ in appropriate circumstances, then I thereby advise you to keep trying.
- True
- False
Q10. When I say, βI convince you to keep tryingβ in appropriate circumstances, then I thereby convince you to keep trying.
- True
- False
Q11. When I say, βI warn you of the dangerβ in appropriate circumstances, then I thereby warn you of the danger.
- True
- False
Q12. When I say, βI make you aware of the dangerβ in appropriate circumstances, then I thereby make you aware of the danger.
- True
- False
Quiz 9: Conversational Acts
Q1. Verbs that name conversational acts pass the thereby test.
- True
- False
Q2. Informing is a conversational act.
- True
- False
Q3. A sentence can be true even when it conversationally implies something false.
- True
- False
Q4. For the following pairs of verbs, which one names a conversational act?
argue, convince
- argue
- convince
Q5. For the following pairs of verbs, which one names a conversational act?
alert, warn
- alert
- warn
Q6. Be relevant.
- Q = Griceβs maxim of quality
- S = Griceβs maxim of strength or quantity
- R = Griceβs maxim of relevance
- M = Griceβs maxim of manner
Q7. Donβt say too little or too much (to serve the shared purpose of conversation).
- Q = Griceβs maxim of quality
- S = Griceβs maxim of strength or quantity
- R = Griceβs maxim of relevance
- M = Griceβs maxim of manner
Q8. Donβt say what you donβt believe or what you have no reason to believe.
- Q = Griceβs maxim of quality
- S = Griceβs maxim of strength or quantity
- R = Griceβs maxim of relevance
- M = Griceβs maxim of manner
Q9. Be brief and orderly and not obscure or ambiguous.
- Q = Griceβs maxim of quality
- S = Griceβs maxim of strength or quantity
- R = Griceβs maxim of relevance
- M = Griceβs maxim of manner
Week 2: Think Again I: How to Understand Arguments Coursera Quiz Answers
Quiz 1: Argument Markers
Q1. Charles went bald because most men his age go bald.
- is an argument
- is not an argument
Q2. Charles went bald, and most men his age go bald.
- is an argument
- is not an argument
Q3. My roommate likes to ski, so I do, too.
- is an argument
- is not an argument
Q4. My roommate likes to ski, and so do I.
- is an argument
- is not an argument
Q5. I have been busy since Tuesday.
- is an argument
- is not an argument
Q6. I am busy, since my teacher assigned lots of homework.
- is an argument
- is not an argument
Q7. He apologized, so you should forgive him.
- premise marker
- conclusion marker
- neither
Q8. In view of the fact that he apologized, you should forgive him.
- premise marker
- conclusion marker
- neither
Q9. He apologized. Accordingly, you should forgive him.
- premise marker
- conclusion marker
- neither
Q10. After he apologizes, you should forgive him.
- premise marker
- conclusion marker
- neither
Q11.Seeing as he apologized, you should forgive him.
- premise marker
- conclusion marker
- neither
Quiz 2: Standard Form
Q1. Indicate which of the standard forms best represents the argument for questions 1-6
Things are a lot quieter because Jesse James left town.
- A.
Things are a lot quieter.
β΄ Jesse James left town.
- B.
Jesse James left town.
β΄ Things are a lot quieter.
Q2. Because Jesse James left town, things are a lot quieter.
- A.
Things are a lot quieter.
β΄ Jesse James left town.
- B.
Jesse James left town.
β΄ Things are a lot quieter.
Q3. The hour is up, so you must hand in your exams.
- A.
You must hand in your exams.
β΄ The hour is up.
- B.
The hour is up.
β΄ You must hand in your exams.
Q4. Other airlines will carry more passengers, for United Airlines is on strike.
- A.
Other airlines will carry more passengers.
β΄ United Airlines is on strike.
- B.
United Airlines is on strike.
β΄ Other airlines will carry more passengers.
Q5. Since Chicago is north of Washington, and Washington is north of Charleston, Chicago is north of Charleston.
- A.
Chicago is north of Washington.
Washington is north of Charleston.
β΄ Chicago is north of Charleston.
- B.
Chicago is north of Charleston.
Washington is north of Charleston.
β΄ Chicago is north of Washington.
Q6. Texas has a greater area than Topeka, and Topeka has a greater area than the Bronx Zoo. Thus, Texas has a greater area than the Bronx Zoo.
- A.
Topeka has a greater area than the Bronx Zoo.
Texas has a greater area than the Bronx Zoo.
β΄ Texas has a greater area than Topeka.
- B.
Texas has a greater area than Topeka.
Topeka has a greater area than the Bronx Zoo.
β΄ Texas has a greater area than the Bronx Zoo.
Quiz 3: A Problem for Arguments
Q1. Indicate the main problem in each of the following arguments for questions 1 and 2
Ram asks Walter which team will win the basketball tournament, and Walter says, βDuke, and I can prove it: Duke is going to win, so Duke will win. Now, prove that I am wrong!β
- The premise is unjustified.
- The argument is circular.
- The argument is infinite..
Q2. Ram asks Walter which team will win the basketball tournament, and Walter says, βDuke, and I can prove it: Duke will score more points than all of its opponents, so Duke will win.β Then Ram asks, βBut how do you know that Duke will score more points than its opponents?β Walter answers, βI donβt know. I just hope so.β
- The premise is unjustified.
- The argument is circular.
- The argument is infinite..
Quiz 4: Assuring
Q1. For each of the underlined words or phrases in the following sentences, indicate whether or not it is an assuring term.
I assure you that you can trust my sister.
- Assuring term
- Not assuring term
Q2. You certainly can trust my sister.
- Assuring term
- Not assuring term
Q3. Imagine that you want to go to a soccer game tonight, so you ask me whether the local team is playing a home game tonight. I respond, βI believe that they are playing a home game tonight.β
- Assuring term
- Not assuring term
Q4. I know that you can trust my sister.
- Assuring term
- Not assuring term
Q5. Only an idiot would deny that you can trust my sister.
- Assuring term
- Not assuring term
Quiz 5: Guarding
Q1. For each of the underlined words or phrases in the following sentences, indicate whether or not it is a guarding term.
Some people have raised questions about her program, so we should oppose it.
- Guarding term
- Not guarding term
Q2. Many people agree that her program wonβt work, so we should oppose it.
- Guarding term
- Not guarding term
Q3. Her program will lead to many problems, so we should oppose it.
- Guarding term
- Not guarding term
Q4. Her program might lead to problems, so we should oppose it.
- Guarding term
- Not guarding
Q5. I suspect that her program will lead to problems, so we should oppose it.
- Guarding term
- Not guarding term
Quiz 6: Discounting
Q1. For each of the underlined words or phrases in the following sentences, indicate whether or not it is a discounting term.
Although it is raining, I am going for a walk anyway.
- Discounting term
- Not discounting term
Q2. I am going for a walk even if it is raining.
- Discounting term
- Not discounting term
Q3. It is raining. Still, I am going for a walk.
- Discounting term
- Not discounting term
Q4. It is still raining, and I am going for a walk.
- Discounting term
- Not discounting term
Q5. Sure, I will get wet from walking in the rain. I will have fun, nevertheless, and I want to get some exercise.
- Discounting term
- Not discounting term
Quiz 7: Evaluation
Q1. Indicate whether the following underlined terms are positively evaluative (E+), negatively evaluative (Eβ), or not evaluative (N).
Janet is an excellent golfer.
- E+
- E-
- N
Q2. The band was playing very loudly.
- E+
- E-
- N
Q3. The band was playing too loudly.
- E+
- E-
- N
Q4. They turned the right way at the intersection.
- E+
- E-
- N
Q5. They mistakenly turned right at the intersection.
- E+
- E-
- N
Q6. They turned just before the other car.
- E+
- E-
- N
Q7. Their punishment was unjust.
- E+
- E-
- N
Quiz 8: Close Analysis (Part II)
Q1. Use the following labels for questions 1-10 to indicate the function of each of the bold words or phrases in this passage from βA Piece of βGodβs Handiworkβ, by Robert Redford (Paragraph 3).
The BLM says its hands are tied. Why? Because these lands were set aside subject to βvalid existing rights,β and Conoco has a lease that gives it the right to drill. Sure Conoco has a leaseβmore than one, in fact βbut those leases were originally issued without sufficient environmental study or public input. As a result, none of them conveyed a valid right to drill. Whatβs more, in deciding to issue a permit to drill now, the BLM did not conduct a full analysis of the environmental impacts of drilling in these incomparable lands, but instead determined there would be no significant environmental harm on the basis of an abbreviated review that didnβt even look at drilling on the other federal leases.
The BLM says its hands are tied.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = None of the above
Q2. Because these lands were set aside subject to βvalid existing rights,β and Conoco has a lease that gives it the right to drill.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = None of the above
Q3. Sure Conoco has a leaseβmore than one, in fact βbut those leases were originally issued without sufficient environmental study or public input.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = None of the above
Q4. Sure Conoco has a leaseβmore than one, in fact βbut those leases were originally issued without sufficient environmental study or public input.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = None of the above
Q5. Sure Conoco has a leaseβmore than one, in fact βbut those leases were originally issued without sufficient environmental study or public input.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = None of the above
Q6. As a result, none of them conveyed a valid right to drill. Whatβs more, in deciding to issue a permit to drill now, the BLM did not conduct a full analysis of the environmental impacts of drilling in these incomparable lands, but instead determined there would be no significant environmental harm on the basis of an abbreviated review that didnβt even look at drilling on the other federal leases.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = None of the above
Q7. Whatβs more, in deciding to issue a permit to drill now, the BLM did not conduct a full analysis of the environmental impacts of drilling in these incomparable lands, but instead determined there would be no significant environmental harm on the basis of an abbreviated review that didnβt even look at drilling on the other federal leases.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = None of the above
Q8. Whatβs more, in deciding to issue a permit to drill now, the BLM did not conduct a full analysis of the environmental impacts of drilling in these incomparable lands, but instead determined there would be no significant environmental harm on the basis of an abbreviated review that didnβt even look at drilling on the other federal leases.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = None of the above
Q9. Whatβs more, in deciding to issue a permit to drill now, the BLM did not conduct a full analysis of the environmental impacts of drilling in these incomparable lands, but instead determined there would be no significant environmental harm on the basis of an abbreviated review that didnβt even look at drilling on the other federal leases.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = None of the above
Q10. Whatβs more, in deciding to issue a permit to drill now, the BLM did not conduct a full analysis of the environmental impacts of drilling in these incomparable lands, but instead determined there would be no significant environmental harm on the basis of an abbreviated review that didnβt even look at drilling on the other federal leases.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = None of the above
Quiz 9: More Close Analysis
Q1. Use the following labels for questions 1-10 to indicate the function of each of the bold words or phrases in this passage from βA Piece of βGodβs Handiworkβ, by Robert Redford (Paragraphs 6-8).What weβre talking about is, in the words of President Clinton, a small piece of βGodβs handiwork.β Almost 4 1/2 million acres of irreplaceable red rock wilderness remain outside the monument. Let us at least protect what is within it. The many roadless areas within the monument should remain soβprotected as wilderness. The monumentβs designation means little if a pattern of exploitation is allowed to continue.Environmentalistsβincluding the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, the Natural Resources Defense Council, and the Wilderness Societyβappealed BLMβs decision to the Interior Departmentβs Board of Land Appeals. This appeal, however, was rejected earlier this month. This is a terrible mistake. We shouldnβt be drilling in our national monuments. Period. As President Clinton said when dedicating the new monument, βSometimes progress is measured in mastering frontiers, but sometimes we must measure progress in protecting frontiers for our children and children to come.β
Allowing drilling to go forward in the Grand Staircase-Escalante Monument would permanently stain what might otherwise have been a defining legacy of the Clinton presidency. Almost 4 1/2 million acres of irreplaceable red rock wilderness remain outside the monument.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = None of the above
Q2. The many roadless areas within the monument should remain soβprotected as wilderness.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = None of the above
Q3. The many roadless areas within the monument should remain soβprotected as wilderness.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = None of the above
Q4. The monumentβs designation means little if a pattern of exploitation is allowed to continue.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = None of the above
Q5. This appeal, however, was rejected earlier this month.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = None of the above
Q6. This is a terrible mistake.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = None of the above
Q7. We shouldnβt be drilling in our national monuments.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = None of the above
Q8. We shouldnβt be drilling in our national monuments. Period.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = None of the above
Q9. As President Clinton said when dedicating the new monument, βSometimes progress is measured in mastering frontiers, but sometimes we must measure progress in protecting frontiers for our children and children to come.β
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = None of the above
Q10. Allowing drilling to go forward in the Grand Staircase-Escalante Monument would permanently stain what might otherwise have been a defining legacy of the Clinton presidency.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = None of the above
Week 3: Think Again I: How to Understand Arguments Coursera Quiz Answers
Quiz 1:Validity
Q1. Some valid arguments have true premises and a true conclusion.
- True
- False
Q2. Some valid arguments have true premises and a false conclusion.
- True
- False
Q3. Some valid arguments have false premises and a true conclusion.
- True
- False
Q4. Some valid arguments have false premises and a false conclusion.
- True
- False
Q5. Most professors agree that they are paid too little, so they are.
- Valid argument
- Invalid argument
Q6. Susan is smart and strong, so she is smart.
- Valid argument
- Invalid argument
Q7. Sara is either smart or strong, so she is smart.
- Valid argument
- Invalid argument
Q8. Washington is in the United States. I live in Washington. So I live in the United States.
- Valid argument
- Invalid argument
Q9. The state of Washington is in the United States. I live in the state of Washington. So I live in the United States.
- Valid argument
- Invalid argument
Q10. The state of Washington is in the United Kingdom. I live in the state of Washington. So I live in the United Kingdom.
- Valid argument
- Invalid argument
Q11. There is no largest six digit number, because six digit numbers are numbers and there is no largest number.
- Valid argument
- Invalid argument
Quiz 2: Soundness (Part I)
Q1. Every argument with a true conclusion is sound.
- True
- False
Q2. Every argument with a false conclusion is unsound.
- True
- False
Q3. Every argument that is sound has a true conclusion.
- True
- False
Q4. Every argument that is unsound has a false conclusion.
- True
- False
Quiz 3: Soundness (Part II)
Q1. For questions 1-3. Assume that the following sentences are either true (T) or false (F) as indicated:
All my children are teenagers. (T)
All teenagers are students. (T)
All teenagers are my children. (F)
All my children are students. (T)
Using these assigned truth values, label each of the following arguments as (a) valid and sound, (b) valid but unsound, (c) invalid but sound, (d) invalid and unsound.
All my children are teenagers.
All teenagers are students.
β΄ All my children are students.
- Valid and sound
- Valid but unsound
- Invalid and unsound
- Invalid but sound
Q2. All my children are students.
All teenagers are students.
β΄ All my children are teenagers.
- Valid and sound
- Valid but unsound
- Invalid and unsound
- Invalid but sound
Q3. All teenagers are my children.
All my children are students.
β΄ All teenagers are students.
- Valid and sound
- Valid but unsound
- Invalid and unsound
- Invalid but sound
Quiz 4: Get Down to Basics
Q1. For questions 1-7, indicate whether the underlined words in the following sentences should be removed as excess verbiage when reconstructing the argument.
Philadelphia is rich in history, but it is not now the capital of the United States, so the United States Congress must meet somewhere else.
- Remove
- Do not remove
Q2. Not everybody whom you invited is going to come to your party. Some of them wonβt come. So this room should be big enough.
- Remove
- Do not remove
Q3. I know that my wife is at home, since I just called her there and spoke to her. We talked about our dinner plans.
- Remove
- Do not remove
Q4. Some students could not concentrate on the lecture, because they did not eat lunch before class.
- Remove
- Do not remove
Q5. The most surprising news of all is that Johnson dropped out of the race because he thought his opponent was better qualified than he was for the office.
- Remove
- Do not remove
Q6. The challenger in this election is likely to win, since experts agree that more women support him.
- Remove
- Do not remove
Q7. Married people are happier, so marriage must be a good thing, or at least I think so.
- Remove
- Do not remove
Quiz 5: Sharpen Edges
Q1. For questions 1-5, indicate whether or not the underlined premise can be broken up into the suggested parts.
James is on the chess and football teams. Football is a team sport. So James plays a team sport.
Can the first premise be broken up into (a) and (b)?
(a) James is on the chess team.
(b) James is on the football team.
(c) Football is a team sport.
β΄ (d) James plays a team sport.
- yes
- no
Q2. Mary is either a junior or a senior, so she is almost ready to graduate.
Can this premise be broken up into (a) and (b)?
(a) Mary is a junior.
(b) Mary is a senior.
β΄ (c) Mary is almost ready to graduate.
- yes
- no
Q3. Mercury is the only common metal that is liquid at room temperature, so a pound of mercury would be liquid in this room.
Can this premise be broken up into (a) and (b)?
(a) Mercury is the only common metal.
(b) Mercury is liquid at room temperature.
β΄ (c) a pound of mercury would be liquid in this room.
- yes
- no
Q4. Since he won the lottery, heβs rich and lucky, so heβll probably do well in the stock market, too, unless his luck runs out.
Can this conclusion be broken up into (c) and (d)?
(a) He won the lottery.
β΄ (b) Heβs rich and lucky.
(c) His luck will not run out.
β΄ (d) Heβll probably do well in the stock market.
- yes
- no
Q5. Since many newly emerging nations do not have the capital resources that are necessary for sustained growth, they will continue to need help from industrial nations to avoid mass starvation.
Can this premise be broken up into (a) and (b)?
(a) Adequate capital resources are necessary for sustained growth.
(b) Many newly emerging nations do not have adequate capital resources.
β΄ (c) Many newly emerging nations will continue to need help from industrial nations to avoid mass starvation.
- yes
- no
Quiz 6: Organize Parts
Q1. For each of the following arguments, indicate which of the following arrangements best represents its structure.
ARGUMENT: I know Pat canβt be a father, because she is not a male. So she canβt be a grandfather either.
- (A)
(1) Pat canβt be a father, because Pat is not male.
β΄ (2) Pat canβt be a grandfather. (from 1-2)
- (B)
(1) Pat is not male.
(2) Pat canβt be a father.
β΄ (3) Pat canβt be a grandfather. (from 1-2)
- (C)
(1) Pat is not male.
β΄ (2) Pat canβt be a father. (from 1)
β΄ (3) Pat canβt be a grandfather. (from 2)
- (D)
(1) Pat is not male.
β΄ (2) Pat canβt be a grandfather. (from 1)
β΄ (3) Pat canβt be a father. (from 2)
Q2. Which kind of structure does the argument in Question 1 have
- Linear structure
- Branching structure
- Joint structure
- None of the above
Q3. ARGUMENT: Our team canβt win this Saturday, both because they are no good and also because they are not going to play this Saturday.
- (A)
(1) Our team is no good.
(2) Our team is not going to play this Saturday.
β΄ (3) Our team canβt win this Saturday. (from 1-2)
- (B)
(1) Our team is no good.
β΄ (2) Our team is not going to play this Saturday. (from 1)
β΄ (3) Our team canβt win this Saturday. (from 2)
- (C)
(1) Our team is not going to play this Saturday.
β΄ (2) Our team is no good. (from 1)
β΄ (3) Our team canβt win this Saturday. (from 2)
- (D)
(1) Our team is no good.
β΄ (2) Our team canβt win this Saturday. (from 1)
(3) Our team is not going to play this Saturday.
β΄ (2) Our team canβt win this Saturday. (from 3)
Q4. Which kind of structure does the argument in Question 3 have?
- Linear structure
- Branching structure
- Joint structure
- None of the above
Q5. ARGUMENT: Either Jack is a fool or Mary is a crook, because she ended up with all of his money.
- (A)
(1) Mary ended up with all of Jackβs money.
β΄ (2) Either Jack is a fool or Mary is a crook. (from 1)
- (B)
(1) Either Jack is a fool or Mary is a crook.
β΄ (2) Mary ended up with all of Jackβs money. (from 1)
- (C)
(1) Mary ended up with all of Jackβs money.
β΄ (2) Mary is a crook. (from 1)
β΄ (3) Jack is a fool. (from 2)
- (D)
(1) Mary ended up with all of Jackβs money.
β΄ (2) Mary is a crook. (from 1)
(1) Mary ended up with all of Jackβs money.
β΄ (3) Jack is a fool. (from 1)
Q6. Which kind of structure does the argument in Question 5 have?
- Linear structure
- Branching structure
- Joint structure
- None of the above
Q7. ARGUMENT: Gold is a metal, so it must conduct electricity, since all metals do.
- (A)
(1) Gold is a metal.
β΄ (2) Gold must conduct electricity, since all metals do. (from 1)
- (B)
(1) Gold is a metal.
β΄ (2) All metals conduct electricity. (from 1)
β΄ (3) Gold must conduct electricity. (from 2)
- (C)
(1) Gold is a metal.
β΄ (2) Gold must conduct electricity. (from 1)
(3) All metals conduct electricity.
β΄ (2) Gold must conduct electricity. (from 1)
- (D)
(1) Gold is a metal.
(2) All metals conduct electricity.
β΄ (3) Gold must conduct electricity. (from 1-2)
Q8. Which kind of structure does the argument in Question 7 have?
- Linear structure
- Branching structure
- Joint structure
- None of the above
Quiz 7: Fill in Gaps
Q1. For each of the following arguments, indicate which of the following claims is the best candidate for a suppressed premise in that argument.
CONTEXT: You and Susan are working on a project together, and she is not pulling her weight.
ARGUMENT: Susan refuses to work on Sundays, which shows that she is lazy and inflexible.
- (A) Anyone who refuses to work on Sundays is either lazy or inflexible.
- (B) Anyone who refuses to work on Sundays is both lazy and inflexible.
- (C) Anyone who refuses to work on any day is both lazy and inflexible.
- (D) Sunday is not a day for rest.
Q2. CONTEXT: You are trying to decide whether to visit a sick friend in the hospital.
ARGUMENT: You promised to visit her, so you should visit her.
- (A) You should keep your promises.
- (B) You should visit sick friends.
- (C) You should visit hospitals.
- (D) You should do whatever your friends want.
Q3. CONTEXT: We want to figure out whether Mildred is older than the other candidate for a job.
ARGUMENT: Mildred must be over forty-three, since she has a daughter who is thirty-six years old.
- (A) A person who is not over forty-three cannot have a daughter.
- (B) Only old people can have old daughters.
- (C) Women cannot give birth until they are teenagers.
- (D) Parents must be more than seven years older than their daughters.
Q4. CONTEXT: A boat sank, and authorities have been searching for survivors for over a week.
ARGUMENT: There must not be any survivors, since, if there were any, they would have been found by now.
- (A) There were no survivors.
- (B) Some survivors were found.
- (C) No survivors have been found by now.
- (D) Survivors are always found.
Q5. CONTEXT: You are listening to a lecture in a traditional college classroom, but one person in the audience looks older than the rest. Her name is Mary.
ARGUMENT: Mary canβt be a student, because she is a professor, and professors must already have degrees.
- (A) Students are not old.
- (B) Professors are old.
- (C) Professors cannot be students.
- (D) Students donβt already have degrees.
Quiz 8: Conclude
Q1. If you DO find a reconstruction that is sound, then the conclusion of the argument that you reconstructed is:
- True
- False
Q2. If you do NOT find a reconstruction that is sound, then the argument that you reconstructed:
- Is sound
- Is unsound
- Could be either sound or unsound
Q3. If you find a reconstruction that is not sound, then the argument that you reconstructed:
- Is sound
- Is unsound
- Could be either sound or unsound
Quiz 9: An Example of Reconstruction
Q1. For questions 1-4, each short passage is followed by possible reconstructions of the argument in that passage. Indicate which of the reconstructions best represents the argument in that passage.
His natural talents were not enough; he lost the match because he had not practiced sufficiently. You need either great natural talent or hard work to become a winner.
- (A)
(1) His natural talents were not enough.
β΄ (2) He had not practiced sufficiently. (from 1)
β΄ (3) He lost the match. (from 2)
- (B)
(1) His natural talents were not enough.
β΄ (2) He lost the match. (from 1)
(3) He had not practiced sufficiently.
β΄ (2) He lost the match. (from 3)
- (C)
(1) His natural talents were not enough to win without practicing.
(2) He had not practiced sufficiently.
(3) People lose matches if they do not either practice sufficiently or
have enough natural talent to win without practicing.
β΄ (4) He lost the match. (from 1-3)
Q2. I took lots of mathematics, so I know that 81 is not a prime number, because 81 is divisible by 3. Indeed, 81 = 3 to the fourth power. Any idiot knows that.
- (A)
(1) 81 is divisible by 3.
β΄ (2) 81 is not a prime number. (from 1)
- (B)
(1) 81 is evenly divisible by 3.
(2) 81 is evenly divisible by 1.
(3) 81 is evenly divisible by 81.
(4) 1, 3, and 81 are three different numbers.
β΄ (5) 81 is evenly divisible by three different numbers. (from 1-4)
(6) Every prime number is evenly divisible by no more than two
different numbers.
(7) Three different numbers is more than two different numbers.
β΄ (8) 81 is not a prime number. (from 5-7)
- (C)
(1) I took lots of mathematics.
β΄ (2) I know that 81 is not a prime number. (from 1)
(3) 81 is divisible by 3.
β΄ (2) 81 is not a prime number. (from 1)
Q3. We really got ripped off by that security company. This burglar alarm wonβt work unless we are lucky or the burglar uses the front door, so we canβt count on it. I think we need a new alarm.
- (A)
(1) This burglar alarm wonβt work unless we are lucky or the burglar
uses the front door.
(2) We canβt count on being lucky.
(3) We canβt count on the burglar using the front door.
(4) We canβt count on a burglar alarm that wonβt work.
β΄ (5) We canβt count on this burglar alarm. (from 1-4)
(6) This burglar alarm is the only one that we have.
(7) We need a burglar alarm that we can count on.
β΄ (8) We need a new burglar alarm. (from 5-7)
- (B)
(1) We are not lucky.
(2) The burglar wonβt use the front door.
β΄ (3) This burglar alarm wonβt work. (from 1-2)
(4) We need a burglar alarm that will work.
β΄ (5) We need a new burglar alarm. (from 3-4)
- (C)
(1) We canβt count on this burglar alarm.
β΄ (2) It wonβt work unless we are lucky. (from 1)
(3) We canβt count on this burglar alarm.
β΄ (4) We need a new alarm. (from 3)
Q4. Joe is not a freshman, since he lives in a fraternity, and freshmen are not allowed to live in fraternities. He also canβt be a senior, since he has not declared a major. And he canβt be a junior, because I never met him before today, and I would have met him before now if he were a junior. So Joe must be a sophomore.
- (A)
(1) Joe lives in a fraternity.
(2) Freshmen are not allowed to live in fraternities.
(3) Joe is not a freshman.
(4) Joe has not declared a major.
(5) Joe is not a senior.
(6) I never met Joe before today.
(7) If Joe were a junior, I would have met him before today.
(8) Joe is not a junior.
β΄ (9) Joe is a sophomore.
- (B)
(1) Joe lives in a fraternity.
(2) Joe is allowed to live where he lives. (suppressed premise)
(3) Freshmen (first-year students) are not allowed to live in fraternities.
β΄ (4) Joe is not a freshman.
(5) Joe has not declared a major.
(6) All seniors (fourth-year students) have declared a major.
(suppressed premise)
β΄ (7) Joe is not a senior.
(8) I never met Joe before today.
(9) If Joe were a junior (third-year student), then I would have met him
before today.
β΄ (10) Joe is not a junior.
(11) Joe is either a freshman, a sophomore, a junior, or a senior.
(suppressed premise)
β΄ (12) Joe is a sophomore (second-year student). (from 4, 7, 10, and 11)
- (C)
(1) Joe lives in a fraternity.
(2) Joe is allowed to live where he lives. (suppressed premise)
(3) Freshmen (first-year students) are not allowed to live in fraternities.
β΄ (4) Joe is not a freshman.
β΄ (5) Joe is a sophomore (second-year student).
(6) Joe has not declared a major.
(7) All seniors (fourth-year students) have declared a major.
(suppressed premise)
β΄ (8) Joe is not a senior.
β΄ (9) Joe is a sophomore.
(10) I never met Joe before today.
(11) If Joe were a junior (third-year student), then I would have met him
before today.
β΄ (12) Joe is not a junior.
β΄ (13) Joe is a sophomore.
Week 4: Think Again I: How to Understand Arguments Coursera Quiz Answers
Quiz 1: Final Quiz
Q1. The goal of an
argument is to abuse the audience.
- True
- False
Q2. All arguments are
made up of (or expressed in) language of some kind.
- True
- False
Q3. Every argument has
more than one premise.
- True
- False
Q4. An argument that is
spoken is no good if it is not spoken loudly enough.
- True
- False
Q5.Arguments are never used for any purpose other than to justify or to explain their conclusions.
- True
- False
Q6. Language is arbitrary
in some respects.
- True
- False
Q7. The word βsinceβ is
always a premise marker.
- True
- False
Q8. In the sentence βIf I had children who had children who had children who had children who had children, then I would be a great-great-great-grandparent,β the phrase βIf β¦ then β¦β is an argument marker which indicates that the person who says this is arguing for the conclusion that I am a great-great-great-grandparent.
- True
- False
Q9. The word βtooβ in
βtoo smallβ introduces an evaluation.
- True
- False
Q10. A _ term is used to
weaken a claim in order to make it easier to defend against possible
criticisms.
- A = assuring
- G = guarding
- D = discounting
- E = evaluative
Q11. A _ term can be
either positive or negative.
- A = assuring
- G = guarding
- D = discounting
- E = evaluative
Q12. Indicate the best way to complete the following sentence.
An argument is sound
(in the technical sense used in this course) when and only when:
- i β its conclusion is
true. - ii β its premises are
true. - iii β the argument is
valid and its premises are true. - iv β the argument is
valid or its premises are true.
Q13. Classify the following sentences as N, A, V, or B. In
assessing soundness, you may assume commonly known facts.
Mount Everest is
taller than Mount Kilimanjaro. Mount Kilimanjaro is taller than every anthill.
Therefore, Mount Everest is taller than any anthill.
- N = not an argument
- A = an argument that is neither valid nor sound
- V = an argument that is valid but not sound
- B = an argument that is both valid and sound
Q14. Classify the following sentence as N, A, V, or B. In assessing soundness, you may assume commonly known facts.
He is so strong that
he can lift 100 kilograms.
- N = not an argument
- A = an argument that
is neither valid nor sound - V = an argument that
is valid but not sound - B = an argument that
is both valid and sound
Q15. Using the following letters for Questions 15-26,
P = a premise marker
C = a conclusion marker
A = an assuring term
G = a guarding term
D = a discounting term
E+ = a positive evaluative term
E- = a negative evaluative term
N = none of the above
indicate the main function of the term
or phrase that is CAPITALIZED, BOLDED, and UNDERLINED in the following passage.
More than one letter might be acceptable, but you must choose only one option
as the best.
From Steven Jay Gould: βThe Pandaβs Thumbβ
β¦ The message is paradoxical BUT profound. Orchids manufacture
their intricate devices from the common components of ordinary flowers, parts usually fitted for very different
functions. If God had designed a beautiful
machine to reflect his wisdom and power, surely he would not have used a collection of parts generally
fashioned for other purposes. Orchids were not made by an ideal engineer; they are jury-rigged
from a limited set of available components.
Thus, they must have evolved from ordinary flowers.
Thus the paradox and the common theme of this trilogy of essays: Our textbooks
like to illustrate evolution with examples of optimal designβnearly perfect mimicry of a dead leaf
by a butterfly or of a poisonous
species by a palatable relative. However,
ideal design is a lousy argument
for evolution, for it mimics the
postulated action of an omnipotent creator. Odd arrangements and funny
solutions are the proof of
evolutionβpaths that a sensible God would never tread but that a natural
process, constrained by history, follows perforce.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = none of the above
Q16. This passage is by John Russell:
βThere never was a painter like Thomas Eakins, who was born in 1844, died in 1916β¦. It is not simply that in his hands painting became an exact science, so that if he paints two men rowing on a river, we can tell the month, day, and the hour that they passed UNDER a certain bridge. We admire Eakins for that, but we prize him above all for the new dimension of moral awareness that he brought to American painting.β
- P =a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = none of the above
Q17.This passage is by John Russell:
βThere never was a painter like Thomas Eakins, who was born in 1844, died in
1916β¦. It is not simply that in his hands painting became an exact science, so that if he paints two men rowing
on a river, we can tell the month, day, and the hour that they passed under a
certain bridge. We admire Eakins for that, BUT
we prize him above all for the new dimension of moral awareness that he brought
to American painting.β
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = none of the above
Q18. This passage is by
John Russell:
βThere never was a painter like Thomas Eakins, who was born in 1844, died in
1916β¦. It is not simply that in his hands painting became an exact science, so that if he paints two men rowing
on a river, we can tell the month, day, and the hour that they passed under a
certain bridge. We admire Eakins for that, but we prize him above all FOR the new dimension of moral
awareness that he brought to American painting.β
- R = an argument marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
N = none of the above
Q19. From Steven Jay Gould: βThe
Pandaβs Thumbβ
β¦ The message is paradoxical but
profound. Orchids manufacture their intricate devices from the common
components of ordinary flowers, parts usually
fitted for very different functions. If God had designed a beautiful machine to reflect his
wisdom and power, surely he
would not have used a collection of parts generally fashioned for other
purposes. Orchids were not made by an IDEAL engineer; they are
jury-rigged from a limited set of available components.
Thus, they must have evolved from ordinary flowers.
Thus the paradox and the common theme of this trilogy of essays: Our textbooks
like to illustrate evolution with examples of optimal designβnearly perfect mimicry of a dead leaf
by a butterfly or of a poisonous
species by a palatable relative. However,
ideal design is a lousy argument
for evolution, for it mimics the
postulated action of an omnipotent creator. Odd arrangements and funny
solutions are the proof of
evolutionβpaths that a sensible God would never tread but that a natural
process, constrained by history, follows perforce.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = none of the above
Q20. From an advertisement for Equal Exchange Coffee (1997):
It may be a little early in the morning to bring this up, but if you buy coffee from large corporations, you are inadvertently maintaining the system which keeps small farmers poor while lining the pockets of rich corporations. By choosing Equal Exchange coffee, you CAN help to make a change. We believe in trading directly with small farming cooperatives at mutually agreed-upon prices with a fixed minimum rate. Then, should the coffee market decline, the farmers are still guaranteed a fair price. So have a cup of Equal Exchange Coffee and make a small farmer happy. Of course, your decision to buy Equal Exchange need not be completely altruistic. For we take as much pride in refining the taste of our gourmet coffees as we do in helping the farmers who produce themβ¦.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = none of the above
Q21. This passage is by Paul Davies:
βThere is little on the Moon to sustain human life. Mars, however, is a different story. Because of the planetβs relatively benign environment, it is theoretically able to support a permanent human presence. If provided with the right equipment, astronauts would have SOME chance of living there for years. A one-way trip to Mars need not mean a quick demise.β
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = none of the above
Q22. By Ben Selznik:
βThe drinking age is not set by the federal government; it is set by the
states. Currently, each state has its law set at 21. However, this figure neither necessarily reflects research and
careful consideration nor appeals to constituents. Instead, it reflects the
fact that drinking age became tied to highway funds somewhere along the way.
Because of this, were a state to lower their drinking age, they would also have
to significantly raise taxes to offset the lost highway funds from the
government. This hand-tying is asinine. if the drinking age is a state DECISION, it should be made by states independently
of funds for highways. Before any progress can be made, lawmakers must sever
this illogical connection.β
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = none of the above
Q23. This passage is by
Paul Davies:
βOBVIOUSLY this strategy carries significant risks in
addition to those faced by a conventional Mars mission. Major equipment failure
could leave the colony without enough power, oxygen or food. An accident might
kill or disable an astronaut who provided some vital expertise. A supply drop
might fail, condemning the colonists to starve in a very public way. Even if
nothing went wrong, the astronautsβ lives would certainly be shortened by the
harsh conditionsβ¦.β
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = none of the above
Q24. From an advertisement for Equal Exchange Coffee (1997):
It may be a little early in the morning to bring this up, but if you buy coffee from large corporations, you are inadvertently maintaining the system which keeps small farmers poor while lining the pockets of rich corporations. By choosing Equal Exchange coffee, you can help to make a change. We believe in trading directly with small farming cooperatives at mutually agreed-upon prices with a fixed minimum rate. Then, should the coffee market decline, the farmers are still guaranteed a fair price. So have a cup of Equal Exchange Coffee and make a small farmer happy. OF COURSE, your decision to buy Equal Exchange need not be completely altruistic. For we take as much pride in refining the taste of our gourmet coffees as we do in helping the farmers who produce themβ¦.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = none of the above
Q25. By Ben Selznik:
βA fair portion of drinkers between the ages of 18 and 21 are at colleges where alcohol can be easily obtained.β¦ [C]olleges know full well that underage drinking exists. Students know that they are drinking underage and therefore illegally. And yet, the game continues with colleges trying to make sure that no alcohol-related tragedies occur. This game isnβt the fault of colleges, nor is it the fault of students. Instead, it is the fault of our law, which classifies part of this college-age set as βunderageβ and the rest as βof age.β When it comes to colleges, our law OBVIOUSLY doesnβt reflect reality. It must therefore be changed.β
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
- E- = a negative evaluative term
- N = none of the above
Q26. From Steven Jay Gould: βThe Pandaβs Thumbβ
β¦ The message is paradoxical but profound. Orchids manufacture their intricate devices from the common components of ordinary flowers, parts usually fitted for very different functions. If God had designed a beautiful machine to reflect his wisdom and power, surely he would not have used a collection of parts generally fashioned for other purposes. Orchids were not made by an ideal engineer; they are jury-rigged from a limited set of available components. Thus, they must have evolved from ordinary flowers.
Thus the paradox and the common theme of this trilogy of essays: Our textbooks like to illustrate evolution with examples of optimal designβnearly perfect mimicry of a dead leaf by a butterfly or of a poisonous species by a palatable relative. However, ideal design is a lousy argument for evolution, for it mimics the postulated action of an omnipotent creator. Odd arrangements and funny solutions are the REASONS to believe in of evolutionβpaths that a sensible God would never tread but that a natural process, constrained by history, follows perforce.
- P = a premise marker
- C = a conclusion marker
- A = an assuring term
- G = a guarding term
- D = a discounting term
- E+ = a positive evaluative term
E- = a negative evaluative term
N = none of the above
Q27. Which of the following sentences could be added as a suppressed premise to make this
argument valid?
All criminals have tattoos, so Gizelle is not a criminal.
- (i) Only criminals have tattoos.
- (ii) Most people with
tattoos are criminals. - (iii) Gizelle has a
tattoo. - (iv) Gizelle does not
have a tattoo.
Q28. Which of the following sentences could
be added as a suppressed premise to make this argument valid?
Pigs cannot fly, so pigs are not birds.
- (i) Only birds can
fly. - (ii) All birds can
fly. - (iii) Some birds can
fly. - (iv) Some birds
cannot fly.
Q29. Indicate which of the
proposed reconstructions best captures the italicized
argument in the following passages from Steven Jay Gould, βThe Pandaβs
Thumbβ:
β¦ The message is paradoxical but profound. Orchids manufacture
their intricate devices from the common components of ordinary flowers, parts usually fitted for very different
functions. If God had designed a beautiful
machine to reflect his wisdom and power, surely he would not have used a collection of parts generally
fashioned for other purposes. Orchids
were not made by an ideal
engineer; [since] they are jury-rigged from a limited set of available
components. Thus, they must have
evolved from ordinary flowers.
Thus the paradox and the common theme of this trilogy of essays: Our textbooks
like to illustrate evolution with examples of optimal designβnearly perfect mimicry of a dead leaf
by a butterfly or of a poisonous
species by a palatable relative. However,
ideal design is a lousy argument
for evolution, for it mimics the
postulated action of an omnipotent creator. Odd arrangements and funny
solutions are the proof of
evolutionβpaths that a sensible God would never tread but that a natural
process, constrained by history, follows perforce.
- (i)
(1) Orchids were not made by an ideal engineer.
(2) Orchids are jury-rigged from a limited set of available components.
β΄ (3) Orchids must have evolved from
ordinary flowers. (from 1-2)
- (ii)
(1) Orchids were not made by an ideal engineer.
(2) Organisms that were not made by an ideal engineer must have evolved from
ordinary organisms of the same kind.
β΄ (3) Orchids must have evolved from
ordinary flowers. (from 1-2)
(4) Orchids are jury-rigged from a limited set of available components.
(5) Organisms that are jury-rigged from a limited set of available components
must have evolved from ordinary organisms of the same kind.
β΄ (3) Orchids must have evolved from
ordinary flowers. (from 4-5)
- (iii)
(1) Orchids are jury-rigged from a limited set of available
components.
(2) Organisms that are jury-rigged from a limited set of available components
were not made by an ideal engineer.
(3) Orchids are organisms.
β΄ (4) Orchids were not made by an ideal
engineer. (from 1-3)
(5) Organisms that were not made by an ideal engineer must have evolved from
ordinary organisms of the same kind.
(6) Orchids are a kind of flower.
β΄ (7) Orchids must have evolved from
ordinary flowers. (from 3-6)
Q30. Indicate which of the
proposed reconstructions best represents the italicized argument in the following passage from an advertisement
for Equal Exchange Coffee:
It may be a little early in the morning to bring this up, but if you buy coffee from large
corporations, you are inadvertently maintaining the system which keeps
small farmers poor while lining the pockets of rich corporations. By choosing Equal Exchange coffee, you
can help to make a change. We
believe in trading directly with small farming cooperatives at mutually
agreed-upon prices with a fixed minimum rate. Then, should the coffee market
decline, the farmers are still guaranteed a fair price. So have
a cup of Equal Exchange Coffee and make a small farmer happy. Of course, your decision to buy Equal
Exchange need not be completely altruistic. For we take as much pride in refining the taste of our gourmet
coffees as we do in helping the
farmers who produce themβ¦.
- (i)
(1) Your decision to buy Equal Exchange Coffee need not be
completely altruistic.
β΄ (2) We take as much pride in refining
the taste of our gourmet coffees as we do in helping the farmers who produce
them. (from 1)
- (ii)
(1) We take as much pride in refining the taste of our
gourmet coffees as we do in helping the farmers who produce them.
β΄ (2) Your decision to buy Equal
Exchange Coffee need not be completely altruistic. (from 1)
- (iii)
(1) Equal Exchange Coffee company takes as much pride in
refining the taste of their gourmet coffees as they do in helping the farmers
who produce their gourmet coffees.
(2) Equal Exchange Coffee company takes great pride in helping the farmers who
produce their gourmet coffees.
β΄ (3) Equal Exchange Coffee company
takes great pride in refining the taste of their gourmet coffees. (from 1-2)
(4) If Equal Exchange Coffee company takes great pride in refining the taste of
their gourmet coffees, then their gourmet coffees will taste good.
β΄ (5) Equal Exchange gourmet coffees
will taste good. (from 3-4)
(6) If Equal Exchange gourmet coffees will taste good, then you can make
yourself happy by buying Equal Exchange gourmet coffees.
β΄ (7) You can make yourself happy by
buying Equal Exchange gourmet coffees. (from 5-6)
(8) If you can make yourself happy by doing something, then your decision to do
it need not be completely altruistic.
β΄ (9) Your decision to buy Equal
Exchange need not be completely altruistic. (from 7-8)
We will Update These Answers Soon. Keep Updated Yourself!.
More About This Course
In this course, you will learn what an argument is. The definition of argument will enable you to identify when speakers are giving arguments and when they are not. Next, you will learn how to break an argument into its essential parts, how to put them in order to reveal their connections, and how to fill in gaps in an argument by adding suppressed premises. By the end of this course, you will be better able to understand and appreciate arguments that you and other people present.
Suggested Readings: Students who want more detailed explanations or additional exercises or who want to explore these topics in more depth should consult Understanding Arguments: An Introduction to Informal Logic, Ninth Edition, Concise, Chapters 1-5, by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and Robert Fogelin. Course Format: Each week will be divided into multiple video segments that can be viewed separately or in groups. There will be short ungraded quizzes after each segment (to check comprehension) and a longer graded quiz at the end of the course.
SKILLS YOU WILL GAIN
- Evaluation
- Interpretation
- Language
- Linguistics
Read Also Articles:
- Mindshift: Break Through Obstacles to Learning Coursera Courses Quiz Answers
- Sequences, Time Series and Prediction Coursera Quiz Answers | Get Free Coursera Verified Certificate in 2021
- Oral Communication for Engineering Leaders Coursera Quiz Answer [Updated AnswersβΌοΈ] 2021
- Six Sigma Advanced Analyze Phase Coursera Quiz Answers [Updated AnswersβΌοΈ] 2021
- Renewable Energy and Green Building Entrepreneurship Coursera Exam Answers [Updated AnswersβΌοΈ] 2021
Conclusion
Hopefully, this article will be useful for you to find all theΒ Week, final assessment, and Peer Graded Assessment Answers of the Think Again I: How to Understand Arguments Quiz of CourseraΒ and grab some premium knowledge with less effort. If this article really helped you in any way then make sure to share it with your friends on social media and let them also know about this amazing training. You can also check out our other courseΒ Answers.Β So, be with us guys we will share a lot more free courses and their exam/quiz solutions also, and follow ourΒ Techno-RJΒ BlogΒ for more updates.
I have read your article carefully and I agree with you very much. This has provided a great help for my thesis writing, and I will seriously improve it. However, I don’t know much about a certain place. Can you help me?
cialis medication coupon for cialis ed pills online
buy estrace 1mg lamictal cost purchase prazosin for sale
mebendazole medication tadalis for sale tadalafil cost
purchase avanafil for sale tadalafil uk cambia order
buy cheap generic indocin suprax 100mg drug cefixime 200mg price
brand amoxicillin 250mg biaxin 500mg uk buy biaxin generic
order catapres 0.1 mg online buy catapres 0.1 mg pill order generic tiotropium bromide
order minocin 50mg without prescription actos 30mg sale cost actos 30mg
buy arava online cheap viagra 50 mg sulfasalazine 500 mg pills
order accutane 10mg sale buy amoxicillin 500mg sale order zithromax 500mg online
purchase tadalafil order sildenafil 50mg pills buy tadalafil 5mg without prescription
stromectol order causes of ed deltasone 5mg uk
order furosemide 40mg sale order lasix 100mg without prescription cheap ventolin 4mg
order levitra 20mg online cheap vardenafil 20mg for sale buy plaquenil for sale
buy ramipril without prescription altace 10mg usa order arcoxia 120mg online
buy cheap generic mesalamine astelin generic buy avapro without prescription
buy olmesartan 10mg pills depakote canada buy generic depakote 500mg
temovate over the counter order cordarone sale generic amiodarone
diamox 250mg canada acetazolamide brand brand imuran 50mg
order coreg 6.25mg without prescription chloroquine 250mg without prescription buy chloroquine sale
order digoxin generic oral lanoxin purchase molnupiravir generic
naproxen medication cost lansoprazole 30mg order lansoprazole 15mg sale
singulair sale buy dapsone generic purchase dapsone
order baricitinib pill olumiant without prescription buy atorvastatin 20mg pill
nifedipine 10mg over the counter aceon 8mg oral brand fexofenadine 180mg
buy cheap dapoxetine xenical 60mg brand order xenical 120mg generic
buy lopressor 50mg generic medrol 4 mg without a doctor prescription buy medrol for sale
diltiazem cost allopurinol 100mg drug allopurinol 300mg sale
aristocort 10mg ca buy triamcinolone 10mg pill buy claritin 10mg pills
rosuvastatin 20mg pills buy ezetimibe pills for sale motilium 10mg ca
buy tetracycline 500mg for sale buy tetracycline 500mg online cheap order generic baclofen 10mg
ampicillin without prescription order ciprofloxacin 500mg online flagyl online buy
how to buy ketorolac buy generic gloperba over the counter buy propranolol tablets
plavix uk buy coumadin 2mg without prescription order medex pill
cost erythromycin 500mg brand sildenafil tamoxifen 20mg usa
order metoclopramide 20mg for sale buy reglan pill order nexium 20mg for sale
budesonide online order budesonide us buy bimatoprost
buy cheap generic topamax order levaquin for sale levaquin 500mg us
buy methocarbamol paypal methocarbamol 500mg drug order sildenafil generic
avodart over the counter order dutasteride order mobic generic
sildenafil online order cheap sildenafil 50mg order estradiol 1mg generic
order celecoxib 100mg online zofran us ondansetron price
spironolactone 100mg cost cost zocor 10mg generic valtrex
lamotrigine 50mg uk buy lamictal pills for sale minipress sale
brand proscar 5mg buy viagra online overnight viagra delivery
buy tretinoin gel online buy tadalis cheap brand avana 200mg
tadalafil 10mg sildenafil 50mg tablets buy viagra 100mg without prescription
buy generic tadalafil tadacip 10mg price buy indocin 75mg capsule
viagra cialis non prescription erection pills buy generic ed pills online
buy terbinafine pills order cefixime generic amoxicillin over the counter
sulfasalazine 500 mg without prescription calan 120mg ca order verapamil 240mg online
order anastrozole pill buy biaxin generic catapres usa
buy divalproex 250mg without prescription imdur uk imdur where to buy
buy azathioprine medication telmisartan 80mg uk telmisartan over the counter
buy meclizine 25mg generic purchase minomycin pill minocycline 100mg capsules
molnunat 200 mg generic order cefdinir 300mg pills order cefdinir generic
home remedies for ed erectile dysfunction buy sildenafil 100mg for sale viagra ca
buy lansoprazole order proventil 100mcg sale order protonix online
ed pills online buy sildenafil 100mg pills tadalafil 10mg drug
buy pyridium cheap brand pyridium buy symmetrel 100mg online cheap
dapsone drug aceon 4mg ca buy perindopril 4mg sale
herbal ed pills generic tadalafil 20mg purchase cialis online
allegra uk cost ramipril buy glimepiride generic
buy avapro generic oral avapro 150mg buy buspirone 10mg pill
order cordarone 200mg online buy carvedilol 25mg generic phenytoin where to buy
order albendazole online buy generic abilify 30mg buy medroxyprogesterone without prescription
order generic oxybutynin 5mg buy generic elavil 50mg buy generic fosamax
praziquantel drug buy generic hydrochlorothiazide online buy cyproheptadine 4 mg
luvox 50mg oral order fluvoxamine 100mg pills generic duloxetine 40mg
how to buy nitrofurantoin order generic nortriptyline buy pamelor generic
buy glucotrol pill betnovate buy online order betamethasone 20gm cream
panadol buy online pepcid 40mg cheap order pepcid 40mg
anafranil pills prometrium 200mg price progesterone canada
cheap tindamax 300mg bystolic 5mg over the counter buy bystolic tablets
buy prograf buy remeron 30mg without prescription buy requip 1mg generic
cost valsartan 160mg clozaril 100mg us combivent 100mcg tablet
order calcitriol trandate 100 mg without prescription order tricor 160mg without prescription
order decadron 0,5 mg pills brand decadron 0,5 mg nateglinide 120 mg us
capoten online order candesartan drug tegretol price
buy zyban without a prescription bupropion 150 mg us order strattera 25mg generic
buy ciplox 500 mg online ciprofloxacin 500 mg price cefadroxil buy online
seroquel without prescription quetiapine cost escitalopram 20mg usa
epivir medication buy combivir online cheap buy accupril online cheap
frumil 5mg cheap order adapalene online cheap order zovirax generic
bisoprolol 5mg canada oxytetracycline pills oxytetracycline 250 mg generic
buy generic valcivir online order famciclovir generic buy generic ofloxacin over the counter
buy vantin cheap flixotide uk flixotide canada
tadalafil 5mg without prescription viagra in usa viagra price
buy zaditor 1 mg cost zaditor 1 mg imipramine tablet
order minoxytop generic cheap minoxidil buy ed pills uk
aspirin 75 mg generic buy generic aspirin imiquad price
buy precose 25mg order prandin 1mg generic buy fulvicin
buy meloset melatonin price danazol 100 mg capsules
dipyridamole us felodipine 5mg canada pravachol 20mg without prescription
buy generic dydrogesterone over the counter buy empagliflozin for sale empagliflozin medication
fludrocortisone for sale purchase loperamide sale how to buy imodium
oral monograph buy cilostazol 100mg pletal canada
buy prasugrel medication buy thorazine cheap order tolterodine 1mg for sale
ferrous 100 mg us ferrous online buy order sotalol 40 mg generic
order mestinon pills feldene brand buy maxalt
order enalapril 5mg pills casodex 50mg uk duphalac ca
latanoprost eye drop rivastigmine online order exelon 6mg generic
order premarin sildenafil overnight shipping viagra sildenafil 25mg
omeprazole 20mg usa prilosec to treat indigestion lopressor cheap
cost telmisartan order molnupiravir 200mg buy molnupiravir online cheap
buy generic cialis 10mg viagra 100mg pill sildenafil next day delivery
cenforce over the counter aralen 250mg price chloroquine for sale online
provigil for sale prednisone 40mg us buy prednisone 20mg without prescription
cefdinir 300 mg for sale order prevacid generic buy generic prevacid for sale
order isotretinoin 40mg generic order azithromycin online zithromax 250mg cost
how to buy azipro order azipro 500mg pills buy generic gabapentin 100mg
buy lipitor without prescription buy atorvastatin 40mg online order amlodipine pills